AVOID Sling Broadband!!!

March 18th, 2010

Sling Broadband is a dishonest, unprofessional company. They claim to be a WIMAX company in South Florida. And Sling Broadband is literally the most dishonest company I have ever interacted with. The CEO of Sling Broadband is Addiel Lopez. I really can’t even think of any company that comes close. I mean, I think that if they were a used car dealer, they wouldn’t just be overcharging you for a car or anything that typical. I think they would be doing stuff like putting Mercedes logos on an old Toyota and telling you it’s a new Mercedes. They’re at a pretty high level of dishonesty and probably entering into flat-out fraud.

If you are considering Sling Broadband, I strongly recommend that you keep looking. You really don’t want to give them your business. If you’re lucky enough to be able to get Towerstream, they are a much more professional and decent WIMAX company. If you don’t need WIMAX, consider AT&T, or Speakeasy, or Comcast Business. Anything but Sling Broadband. Take my advice, you won’t be sorry. Want to know how much Sling Broadband sucks? Keep reading.

Every single sentence I write here is true, so there’s really nothing that Sling can say or do about it. I’m not just criticizing them or making stuff up, and I don’t have any agenda other than to tell people that are thinking of signing up with Sling Broadband the truth about this company. Consider this a public service announcement. You aren’t going to believe the nerve of these people.

Here’s the story:
As an IT consultant, I am always working with different Internet carriers. I’m a Microsoft partner,
a Certified Microsoft Professional, a Speakeasy partner, a Cisco partner, a Rackspace partner, an Ingram Micro partner, McAfee partner, etc. Basically I partner with whatever company I do business with. Being a partner almost always brings benefits to the client, either directly or indirectly. For example, being a Microsoft Partner give me access to 24/7 support for business-critical issues. Being a Kerio partner lets me offer up to a 15% discount to my clients, etc.

When I had a client that could not get Towerstream, I looked at other WIMAX carriers. Sling Broadband was the only WIMAX company that could offer service. I was reluctant to work with them initially, because of all the typos on their website. (They can’t spell “guarantee” or “equipment”, stuff like that.) They seemed unprofessional for that reason. But I thought, it’s Miami…maybe they are a really great company, just not native English speakers. I can still give them a chance. So I joined their partner program, quoted their service, and it was approved and ordered.

A salesguy named JP sent me an email. I replied back and got this error message:

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mxgate2.biznesshosting.com.
I’m afraid I wasn’t able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I’ve given up. Sorry it didn’t work out.
I thought, that’s weird. An ISP that doesn’t have working email? What’s that about?
Anyway. They gave me an April 28th 2009 date of installation. JP said “be sure to have a check ready for the technician.” Sling Broadband told me that we had to pay 2 months deposit because my client’s credit check had required it. I only discovered later that Sling did not have the client’s DUNS or tax id, and they didn’t even have the client’s official corporate name. They only had the informal DBA name which wouldn’t give them access to any records, which would be in the name of the corporation. So it’s impossible that they ran a credit check. This is the first real dishonest moment; many more would follow.
On April 28, 2 technicians came out onsite and installed the antenna. They wanted the check right away, which was provided to them, including the “deposit” money. The circuit was meant to be a 7mb circuit. The tech told me that there was no way that Sling Broadband could deliver a 7mb circuit. He said that they were oversubscribed. I was told that they had an antenna on the Icon building on South Beach, but that the entire building had something like a 40mb circuit. Sling Broadband had sold us a 7mb circuit, and they had sold DSL to the people in the building, and they had sold some 5 and 10 mb circuits to other clients. It all added up to like 80mb, so obviously they could not provide what they were meant to. That’s what their installer told me, anyway. Sure enough, the circuit tested at about a 2mb circuit.
I got this email from JP:

On Apr 28, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Sling Broadband Sales wrote:
Our sincerest apologies in the bandwidth deficiencies, according to our NOC and Engineering team
This circuit has not yet been allocated the bandwidth you subscribed to. We will be finalizing the installation
This week and you will not incur any charge or commence service till we “officially” turn over a fully deployed
Circuit. Please keep in mind once 100% deployed you will receive your full bandwidth. I apologize for the
Mix-up and sincerely appreciate your time and business.
Best Regards
JPLopez
and then
On Apr 28, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Sling Broadband Sales wrote:
There is plenty of bandwidth available and believe me you will be satisfied with
The performance and CIR on the circuit once fully deployed.
And the owner or something of Sling Broadband, Addiel Lopez, wrote me this:
On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:03 PM, “Addiel Lopez” <alopez@slingbroadband.com> wrote:

I did receive your voice message and have discussed your account with our sales and engineering teams and have also followed up on all communication between my staff and you. As stated by my staff we have yet to complete your circuit do to some technical difficulties in the deployment of your service. We are working on completing your service by Tuesday next week please consider the current connection “a free-bee” we will not commence billing until the service is delivered. I personally thank you for your business and we apologize for any inconvenience in the deployment of your wimax service.

Well, the first week of May came and went and I never heard back from Sling. No email from Addiel Lopez.
And the second week. And the third week. When they had promised “Tuesday of next week.” And then I got this email:

On May 22, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Addiel Lopez wrote:
I completely understand your position and frustration; Your circuit appears as “pending completion” In our systems. Sling Broadband is currently completing the upgrade of network components which will Allow you your 7mbps bandwidth. Please consider that this network upgrade has involved a rather large Construction build out which has involved building permitting and weather has seriously impacted our completion
Of said upgrade this week. Now with that being said I can completely understand if you would like to cancel service Yet I am certain that when we turn up our new upgrades you will be more than satisfied with your Wimax Broadband circuit. For your time and cooperation I am willing to extend the satisfaction period an additional 30days
And provide you with a 50% credit on your 1st months service.
Please let me know how you wish to proceed I can have our technicians on-site to perform the de-installation This upcoming week.
Best Regards!
AddielLopez
CEO - Managing Partner
Then I get this email from JP:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 3:51 PM, “Sling Broadband Sales” <sales@slingbroadband.com> wrote:

We will need to perform this work on-site, Friday between 9AM-11AM is this ok?
Best Regards!

JPLopez

Well, no one showed up. Of course. I sent him an email saying “no one showed” and I got this in reply:

On Jun 27, 2009, at 12:10 AM, “Sling Broadband Sales” <sales@slingbroadband.com> wrote:

We do apologies; our teams were affected by the poor weather conditions today we have moved your Scheduled service date to Tuesday. Our dispatched had sent an email message around 10am today, please accept My apologies if you did not receive this.

Best Regards!

JPLopez

I asked him to see a copy of the email that they sent me saying that they were not coming, and I did not hear back from them. At this point, it is a pattern. If Sling Broadband doesn’t want to respond, they will just ignore your email. Obviously JP was lying about them sending me an email. I didn’t hear back from JP Lopez or Addiel Lopez. The truth is that they had set yet another appointment and failed to show up and failed to let me know, and then the next day when I asked him what happened I get an email telling me that their techs couldn’t work because it was raining!

Well, sometime in July they finally got the bandwidth upgraded on the Icon building. It seems that the installer was right all along, they didn’t have the bandwidth when they sold me the service, and Sling Broadband was not honest about it at all. They installed in April, and we didn’t have the bandwidth we ordered until July!

Well, the connection was ok for a time. Then it went back to being well under 7mb. I guess they are oversold on bandwidth again or something. My client sent them this email:

Did another test today for our link, Sling’s test site, here are the results.  It has not improved.  I have not been contacted for an upgrade as was discussed 3 weeks ago.

I believe that we are paying for 7×7 service and getting 3×3…

On another note, 2 strange things. Sling Broadband’s Partner program promises some kind of commission, I think it’s supposed to be one month or two month’s contracted price or something. But they never paid commission for the sale. When I asked them about it, they just ignored my emails. It is pretty funny. They just won’t reply. They won’t honor their Partner agreement and they refuse to discuss it. Which is strange. Sure, you can trick people into signing up with you, but not more than once. I would never refer Sling Broadband to anyone.

On a related note, when I looked at the bill from Sling Broadband, I was surprised to see that they charge something like 25% in taxes and fees and tariffs. However, Towerstream doesn’t charge any taxes or fees of any kind. Nothing, not a penny. But Sling is all about this-and-that for Federal and this-and-that for State, etc. I strongly suspect that they are improperly collecting revenue as “taxes” given their refusal to discuss what the charges are for or explain why other WIMAX providers don’t charge the same things.

Anyhow, a few months later.

My client is complaining that the circuit is not even half of the 7mb that they are paying for.
Sling’s answer is to promise a “free upgrade” to an 8mb circuit. But if there is not enough bandwidth for 7mb, why would I believe they can offer 8mb?

Instead, I suggest to the client, with a copy to JP, that the circuit be disconnected. They are not living up to their end of the bargain. They are not providing a 7mb circuit, and they have not been honest about the credit-based 2 months’ deposit, keeping appointment times, they lied about sending me email to tell me they weren’t going to show, they are always several months late in doing anything.

This is what I get from JP, he copied my client and some other people:

I find it interesting that after your commission dispute with Sling Broadband you are choosing to taint our name and deviate from your recommendation. It’s our standard operational practices to require a service deposit on organizations with credit Not up to the required criteria. We do not require a DUNS or Tax-id number to pull this Information as we had the organization name and address. We acknowledge that the service has experienced fluctuations in broadband speed. Yet reliability has never been in question as to date we have met all SLA guarantees you so easily throw around. I believe we are taking owner ship of the issue and are placing our best foot forward to correct the matter and provide an acceptable quality service to our customer.

So, I complain that they are billing for a 7mb circuit but not delivering anything more than a 3mb circuit, and they tell my client that I’m just upset because they lied about paying a commission on the circuit? They are billing my client for a service that they are not delivering, and when I call them on it, they try to tell my client that I am just after a commission?

It’s the most unprofessional thing I’ve ever seen done, ever.

I let them know that I am not upset about the fact that they don’t honor their Partner agreement. Although it is true that they promise commissions that they don’t actually pay. But that’s really not why I recommended their service; it was because there was no other carrier that could provide WIMAX so there was no choice. In fact, I really wanted to go with Towerstream and I had Towerstream come out THREE times to see if we could get signal, but we could not, so I was forced to go with Sling. A colleague at Internap had told me to avoid Sling Broadband at all costs, someone at the Terremark building in downtown Miami had had some nightmare experience with Sling, but I told him that we were going to try them anyway and see how it went. I should have listened to him. Anyway.

The only issue is this: they are billing the client for a 7mb circuit and not providing it. And they are dishonest. About virtually everything. Almost everything they have ever said has been dishonest, from bandwidth to billing to appointment times to their SLA and on and on.

Do you need more proof? Here are 2 more examples of how dishonest Sling Broadband is.
These are specific, concrete examples. Irrefutable.

Look at their website, www.slingbroadband.com.  It says this:

Are you with me so far? Note that they promise “99.999% uptime” and that they misspelled the word “guaranteed.” Note the free “equiptment”. But especially note that they say “no taxes.”

Ok.

First point.

“99.999% uptime.” Sling Broadband is flat-out lying to you here. The reality is that when they send you their contract, you won’t find “99.999%” anywhere in the contract. That’s just a misleading thing they like to put on their website to induce you to sign their contract. But when you actually get your contract, you will find out that they are providing you the circuit “as-is” with NO GUARANTEES OF ANY KIND. Here is the actual language from their contract. Note that they provide service “AS-IS” with “no warranty” of any kind. So, their website promises 99.999% uptime, but their contract tells you the complete opposite. See for yourself:

Second point.

“No taxes”? That is what their website claims. So how do they explain this?
This is from one of their invoices. Tell me if they charge taxes or not:

So, they tell you that they don’t charge ANY taxes. The TRUTH is that Sling Broadband charges more than 26% tax in this invoice. In fact the taxes on this $899 circuit are a whopping $235.71. You can see the invoice yourself. But they flat-out lie and tell you that they won’t charge you ANY taxes. I don’t even know how this company is still in business. In fact, I will probably make an official complaint to the Florida regulatory board, the PSC. I mean, what do you think Sling is doing with the money they are taking in as “taxes”? Do you think all that money gets turned over to the proper authorities?

I can tell you that most other WIMAX companies do not charge taxes. For example, Towerstream in reality does not charge taxes, and Towerstream doesn’t lie to their customers like Sling Broadband does. I don’t even work for Towerstream in any way, but I appreciate how decent they are as a company as opposed to those sin verguenzas at Sling Broadband. How can they tell you “NO TAXES!” and then charge you 8 taxes? How can they claim 99.999% uptime, and then their contract promises exactly nothing?

What other company have you ever dealt with that was as dishonest as Sling Broadband?

Anyway. End of saga. No more Sling Broadband for me.

If you are looking for a real company to provide Internet access, whether it’s WIMAX or not, and you are in the South Florida area, contact me and I’ll put you in touch with professional, honest companies that offer excellent products. Not like these guys.

UPDATE:

Since posting this, I got an email from a website called Ripoff Report or something that says that someone made a complaint about my company. I clicked on the link and read a very funny misspelled complaint that says something like “I’M HER IN FLORIA AND THIS COMPANY SCRWED UP MY PHONE AND NOW I OUT OF BUSINESS”. I am not even kidding. They can’t spell the word “here.”

So, we can see Sling Broadband at work. I am certain that they posted it, because it is (1) full of misspelled words and (2) not the truth. And THAT is their style.

Hey Sling Broadband, wise up. You guys are seriously not very smart.

Instead of attacking your customers who have criticisms of your company, by posting fake complaints, why don’t you address your customer’s concerns? Stop telling people that you don’t charge taxes if you charge 25% tax. Stop telling people that you guarantee bandwidth if you do not guarantee bandwidth. Start treating your customers with respect and honesty.

Why not spend your time being honest and fixing what’s wrong with your company?
Oh well. If they were honest, they wouldn’t be Sling Broadband or the Lopez family, I guess.

So, anyone who was considering Sling Broadband as a WIMAX or Internet company in Miami or South Florida:

You should know right now that if you sign up with Sling Broadband, and you make any complaints, they will just complain about you. If you have issues with them, they will have issues with you. Think about whether or not you want to do business with a company like this.

Only very small, petty personalities are like this. Imagine if you went to a company like Nordstrom and you told them “listen, I have a problem. You guys overcharged me for this transaction” and instead of saying “we’re sorry, we’ll make it right” they just said “oh yeah? well, we have a problem with you.”

You see? I complain that Sling Broadband tells people on their website that they don’t charge taxes, when they do charge taxes, and instead of fixing the problem (either stop charging taxes or start telling people that you actually charge 25% tax) they have someone put some made up story like they’re getting even with me or something. Only a child, or a childish adult, would think that way.

Here’s the difference:
My complaints about them are true. And if you Google “Sling Broadband” you will see this page is one of the top entries. In fact, at this time it is second only to their own website. And Ripoff Report, about Sling Broadband, is right behind me. But that’s some other unhappy Sling Broadband customer. Addiel Lopez, why don’t you fix your company?

However, their humorous made-up complaints don’t come up at all if you Google my company.
No one is reading their comments. Except for them. I’m happy they have so much free time.

But Addiel Lopez, you (more likely JP or whichever Lopez has the company laptop this week) are wasting your time. My business is from positive word of mouth, not from the Internet. I am not the one who gets business by tricking people online. So my clients and I don’t really care what you have to say. But I encourage you to keep it up. It’s pretty funny to be honest. You’re all like little kids or something.

Don’t you agree?

Update:

I got this email today which seems to be from Sling Broadband because it’s got misspelled words and it is not true. I offered to remove info about Sling Broadband from my blog if they would just let my client and me disconnect their network and be released from any further business with them. I’m waiting to see what they decide.

In the meantime, this email was sent from a Gmail account, which was not very bright, because you can’t send people emails threatening to “fucking destroy” them without violating several Federal laws. If this person were smart he would have signed up for webmail with a Colombian company or better yet a Cuban company or something. It would have been tougher to track. But Google? Since Google is an American company, it just takes a simple request from any law enforcement agency to get them to release everything they know about the account, where the mails are coming from, etc. I’m thinking I should press charges. I started counting the state and Federal crimes that these guys have just committed but I lost track at 6.
This is how desperate they are, threatening to harm me for writing the truth about Sling Broadband on my blog. Is this a company you want to do business with?

wE aRe a rogue ORGANIZATION IN ROMANIA We have 6 on staff WEB developers and 2 S.E.O specialist THAT WILL DEDICATE THERE COMPLETE FUCKING WEEK IN BASHING YOU, YOUR COMPANY AND ANY FUCKING THING YOU HAVE EVER DONE.
STOP WRITING FICTITIOUS REVIEWS AND COMMENTS
YOU CEASE AND RETRACT AND WE WILL DO THE SAME
PLEASE DO NOT TRY US WE WILL RUIN YOU ON THE WEB. nEXt sTePs WiLL BE ALL SOCIAL NETWORKS, INDUSTRY BLOGS, AND A FULLY SEO’ED SITE DEDICATED TO YOU
WE WILL FUCKING DESTROY YOU LETS PEACEFULLY RETRACT NO HARM DONE WE ALL GO HOME…….
Update 4/20/10:
I have to give them a little credit.
Sling Broadband have removed the part of their website that said that they don’t charge taxes.
I don’t know if they did it because they were scared that Florida or FCC was going to nail them on it
or because they’ve decided to be honest with people as a policy. Either way, good for them.
It’s nice that they’re no longer lying about it.
Now, they are still claiming that they have a 99.999% uptime guarantee. Last time I saw their contract,
this was not true. I would bet that they haven’t changed their contract. So I would encourage them to either remove this part as well, or change the contract to make it true. And maybe they could even spell “guaranteed” correctly.
I’m not particularly interested in overseeing their company or anything. I just object to them libeling me about their (lack of) commission, and lying about their services. If their new contract actually guarantees 99.999% uptime like they claim, then I would have to give them credit for that as well. Haven’t seen that happen yet.

Cisco 7940 SIP Software

November 19th, 2009

So I had a Cisco 7940 in SCCP (AKA “Skinny”) mode.
In other words, the Cisco 7940 VOIP phone that came with the default Cisco software image.
We wanted to make it work with SIP protocol. Easy enough. Just go to www.cisco.com and download
the software, right? After all, the phone was purchased recently. Just download the software.

But no.

Getting the software for the phone was the most difficult part. But after much searching, guess what turned up? A whole pack of software images for the 7900 series phones. Amazing.

Of course, it was still a bit of a chore to upgrade:
1) Make a TFTP server on your computer. I used my Macbook. Airport was connected to the Internet. I set the Ethernet port to a private IP (192.168.1.25) and plugged the phone in with an Ethernet cable. Then turned on Internet sharing in System Preferences.  Scrolled down on the phone to Unlock Config and put the password (default is probably “cisco”). Set the TFTP server address. Rebooted the phone. Still not working.

2) The files that it wants are tricky. You can unzip one of the images, say P0S3-08-8-00.zip which is fairly recent. This will have the .bin file that has the image, plus a TXT file that specifies the image version, a .loads file, an .sb2 file, and an .sbn file. You would think this would be enough, put them in the TFTP server. But no. You’re not even close to finished. You’re going to need a file that looks like SIP(phone mac address).cnf…otherwise known as the SIP Generic Configuration…stuff like your SIP username and password etc…, plus XMLDefault.cnf…that’s the one that really loads the image…, and maybe dialplan.xml. And that XMLDefault.cnf file? You might have to append a .xml at the end.

The XMLDefault.cnf.xml file will look something like this:

<Default>

<callManagerGroup>

<members>

<member priority=”0″>

<callManager>

<ports>

<ethernetPhonePort>2000</ethernetPhonePort>

<mgcpPorts>

<listen>2427</listen>

<keepAlive>2428</keepAlive>

</mgcpPorts>

</ports>

<processNodeName>192.168.1.25</processNodeName>

</callManager>

</member>

</members>

</callManagerGroup>

<loadInformation30007 model=”CP-7912″>CP7912080000SIP060111A</loadInformation30$

<loadInformation8 model=”CP-7940″>P003-08-8-00</loadInformation8>

See that “process node name” above? That’s where you put the IP address of your TFTP server.
And at the bottom where it says the model of phone? CP-7940? Between the > and < you put the file name for the image version, with no file extension…leave off the .bin.
If you’ve found the right files, and edited like above, and they’re sitting in your running TFTP server…remember to turn off your computer firewall for this…your phone should find the XMLDefault.cnf.xml file and it will try to load the .bin file that you specify in LoadInformation. The phone display should say “upgrading application” or something. Check the phone status page on the phone display…it might be telling you that it’s looking for SEP(phone mac address) or something else.
Anyway. You’re not going to get Cisco to help…Google is a better resource.
I hope this helps someone.

AT&T U-verse

March 5th, 2009

I got a flyer in the mail on Tuesday advertising AT&T U-verse, the new (for this area anyway) high-speed Internet and digital TV bundled service. I called them the same day to order. They had available for installs the following morning, or 2 weeks later. I asked for the following morning. 

At 8am, right on time, an AT&T woman came to the door and wanted to look at our phone wiring.
They apparently have to tweak it in some way to make sure it can deliver the higher-speed DSL service of U-verse, which is up to 18mb download and 1.5mb upload. She looked at a few jacks and fiddled with the cables and announced that she was done. Then at around 9am a guy in a U-verse truck showed up to complete the install. This is where it gets interesting.

I had ordered the IPN4320 which has apparently a 320gb hard drive for DVR recording purposes. The installer realized he didn’t actually bring this box with him. He had to go back to his warehouse and get one. This took over 2 hours. By the time he came back, I had to leave the house. He did agree to come back later the same day.

He was going to be back at 5. Then at 6. Then he came at around 7pm with the right box. We connected all the equipment…I say “we”…but the box did not come up. He explained that the new box is a high-capacity hard drive (according to AT&T 320gb is “high-capacity”) and said that they had a lot of trouble with the orders. I wanted to look at the cables, maybe try the coax instead of the CAT5 cable I had plugged in. He glanced at it and said the cables were fine, it was the order was probably wrong. 

He called the “Tier 2″ support for help. They wanted to try using the low-capacity hard drive. So they deleted the order, created an order for the other box and plugged it in. Which is when the installer realized that I had plugged the Ethernet cable for the DVR into the port labelled “Broadband”. See, the U-verse DVR has 4 jacks for Local Ethernet and 1 orange one labelled “Broadband.” So I thought that the LAN stuff goes in the 4 ports, and the WAN goes in the WAN port. Logical, right? But incorrect. Turns out that all the U-verse Ethernet cables have to go into the LAN ports. The port labelled “Broadband” is not normally used. It’s for if you don’t want an RJ-11 cable delivering service, but you want a CAT5 cable coming from the phone box to your house. 

Ok, so they saw the mistake. They asked me if I wanted to leave the low-capacity box, or put the high-capacity one. I said I preferred the high-capacity one I ordered. So the Tier 2 guy deleted my order again,and went to create a new one. About 20 minutes went by. Then he announced that his computer had frozen and he could not complete the order. It would have to wait until the next day. 

I called them at 8am the next day. They entered a new order. And they kept telling me that an installer would come out in 4 weeks with equipment. I had to keep explaining that the equipment was already setup. So they said it was all fixed. But the service was not working. I kept getting transferred to different departments.

The flyer said to call 1-877-356-5177. And they told me to call 1-800-288-2020. And when they asked me where I was and I said “Miami” they told me to call 1-800-234-6852. And when they found out that it was not Miami, Ohio but Miami, Florida, they told me to call 1-800-288-2020 again. I got transferred to a Spanish-language-only repair center for residential customers. Who transferred me to an English high-speed Internet department. Who found out I had U-verse and transferred me again. I hung up and called the installer who told me I had to call 1-866-446-4115. At this point I had to leave the house.

I got back at about 8 or 9pm. I was told that the U-verse tech support was 24/7. And technically it is. But tech support said that they didn’t have the same system or tools as the Sales department and that only Sales could help me, and they were closed after 7pm. All they needed to do was look at the order, but Tech Support and Sales are on 2 different platforms. 

So the next morning the installer sent me a text message that he was working on my issue. He somehow managed to get a Tier 2 tech support person to get my account corrected. It turned out that the person who placed my most recent order put an install date of March 10th. 

Then a guy comes and knocks on my door. He’s a U-verse installer and he has a DVR box and wants to install my “new service.” I’m on the phone with AT&T Tier 2 support already. I laugh. The new installer comes in the house to listen to the phone call and see if we can get it working. 

It took the Tier 2 guy about 45 minutes to place the order. He kept insisting that I must have 2 DVR boxes and 2 televisions. I tell him I only have 1. He keeps telling me that he sees 2 in his system and I must have 2. I tell him there is only the 1 DVR. Eventually he deletes everything and readds it and the service starts working.

I learned that Tier 2 has a direct phone number but they have a weekly code that you need to talk to them.
The AT&T Tier 2 phone number is 1-877-293-9986 

The codes for this week and next are:

3449
9764
7083

They need to keep people from calling them directly because AT&T wants to funnel people through their Tier 1 support. Which unfortunately seems to be staffed entirely by angry people who did not graduate high-school. You can call those people at any time (as long as it’s before 7pm EST) at the above numbers,
and you just have to navigate complicated autoattendant menus and long hold times. But if you want Tier 2, it’s carefully protected since those are the only people who know what they are doing.

Go figure.

So now the download speed is about 12mb and the upload is 1.5mb. 
The digital TV has hundreds and hundreds of channels. They all look a little washed-out
compared to cable, even on a 1080p high-definition monitor. But whatever. 

The speed is twice as fast as the best DSL. And faster than Comcast cable.
It’s a mystery why Google Maps loads very slowly and wants to use HTML instead,
if you’re using DSL or even U-verse.  
The service is absolutely confusing and nightmarish. So if you get it working, great.
But it’s not fun getting there.

AT&T versus Comcast

February 3rd, 2009

For our Residential readers in South Florida, AT&T (formerly Bellsouth) is running a current promotion: sign up for their FastAccess DSL and get a $125 Visa gift card 6 to 8 weeks later. In the AT&T stores, they tell you that it’s a month-to-month contract. (But the paperwork says it’s a 24-month contract.) Their highest speed is “DSL Xtreme 6.0″ which is meant to have a download of 6mb/sec and upload of 512kb/sec. Here is a screenshot of the download speed using speedtest.net in Miami, Florida. It’s pretty close to their advertised speeds:

Comcast is running their own promotion: sign up for their Internet, VOIP phone, and digital movie package, and get a $200 gift card. The Comcast speeds are confusing: where they mention “PowerBoost” and say that you can get download speeds of up to 12mb/sec or 16mb/sec, what they mean is that they are selling 6mb/sec and 8mb/sec connections that will download single files at double that speed…for up to 30 seconds only. The connections are really 6mb or 8mb.  Here is a screenshot of their 8mb circuit using the same test server at roughly the same time. Notice the relatively large upload bandwidth:

So anyway, the DSL from AT&T/Bellsouth costs about $45 a month. The Comcast circuit costs about $50 a month. Here’s another factor: it took no fewer than 9 phone calls to get the AT&T connection provisioned correctly, through about 5 different departments, and about 3 hours total on the phone. It took 1 phone call to Comcast and about 10 minutes on the phone to get the 8mb circuit. 

I want to like AT&T, but their customer service is poor and their bandwidth just doesn’t really compete with cable, so I have to come down on the side of Comcast.

AT&T are meant to have a service called U-Verse that provides 18mb circuit plus digital television streaming and VOIP, but it’s not available everywhere. Some parts of Florida, I don’t think metro Miami has U-Verse yet although they’re working on it. For now, it seems Comcast is still the big residential player. (That’s until Verizon rolls out FIOS in South Florida, if and when that happens. Apparently they have it available everywhere except the largest cities in the state, for some reason. 20mb circuits for the price of Comcast’s 8mb circuit? And 50mb circuits if you’re willing to pay a bit extra? Yes please.)

Today’s Roundup

February 2nd, 2009

So today I switched a client over to Mosso hosting for email and web hosting.
And installed the drivers for an AT&T USB HSPA modem for another client.

And took apart a faulty Macbook G4 for another client. There is an issue where the mouse freezes up on the Macbook at random times. It seems to be a faulty trackpad. When I unplug the trackpad from underneath the keyboard, no problems. Except that you can’t install OS X 10.5 Leopard directly onto it for some reason known only to Apple. You have to start with 10.2 Jaguar or something like that, then upgrade to Leopard. To try to install directly means you get a kernel panic with cryptic messages.

Towerstream Rocks

January 28th, 2009

 

 

 

I installed a Towerstream circuit in Brickell yesterday.
It was meant to be a 5mb circuit, which for some reason is priced
the same as their 3mb circuits at $499 a month. (I think they are discontinuing
the 3mb circuits entirely.) Here’s the thing:

-the circuit was installed literally the day after signing the contract

-it took about 3 hours to install

-the download speed is consistently around 15 or 17 mb/sec and the upload is around 6 or 7 mb/sec.

A 17mb download stream. For $499 a month. Towerstream is amazing. Very highly recommended.
It’s the best installation I’ve ever seen. Compare to the standard T1 which takes Bellsouth to come out and install it, and takes about a month and a half, and the speed is always around 1mb.

 

-Thomas

Spam is back

January 27th, 2009

I’m putting MX Logic Email Defense up today for my own domain.
I strongly recommend their platform as the most accurate spam filter available.
And spam is growing exponentially: 

Spam levels have recovered from the November takedown of Internet Service Provider McColo with vigor and are set to be at pre-McColo levels over the next month, a Google Message Security report found.

Since November, spam has continued to grow 156 percent. And in light of spam’s rapid upward growth, experts at Google Message Security, powered by Postini, anticipate that spam is likely to reach pre-McColo levels within the next three to five weeks.

Apple iWork ‘09 virus in pirated copies

January 24th, 2009

Be careful what you install:

Internet security firm Intego said on Thursday that it has discovered a new Trojan horse in pirated copies of Apple’s iWork ‘09 productivity software that could allow an attacker to take control of the infected computer.

The Trojan horse, OSX.Trojan.iServices.A, discovered circulating in copies of the software on BitTorrent trackers and other pirate sites, is rated serious, according to Intego’s security alert.

When iWork is installed, the Trojan is installed as a start-up item as a part of iWorkServices. It has read-write-execute permissions for root control of the computer, Intego said. The malware connects to a remote server over the Internet and may download additional components to the infected computer.

As of early Thursday, at least 20,000 people had downloaded the iWork ‘09 installer, according to Intego.

Meanwhile, an Italian researcher has uncovered a way to inject malicious code into memory of OS X-based computers, which would enable attackers to easily hide their activities, according to The Register.